Stop obsessing with how personally green you live and start collectively taking on corporate power
Would you advise someone to flap towels in a burning home? To bring a flyswatter to a gunfight? Yet the attorney we hear on climate change could scarcely be more out of sync with the nature of the crisis.
The email in my inbox last week offered thirty suggestions to green my office space: utilize reusable pens, redecorate with light colourings, stop using the elevator.
Back at home, done huffing stairs, I could get on with other options: change my lightbulbs, buy local veggies, purchase eco-appliances, put a solar panel on my roof.
And a study released on Thursday claimed it had figured out the single best route to fight climate change: I could swear off ever having a child.
These pervasive exhortations to individual action in corporate ads, school textbooks, and the campaigns of mainstream environmental groups, especially in the west seem as natural as the air we breath. But we could hardly be worse-served.
While we busy ourselves greening our personal lives, fossil fuel corporations are rendering these efforts irrelevant. The breakdown of carbon emissions since 1988? A hundred companies alone are responsible for an astonishing 71 percentage. You tinker with those pens or that panel; they go on torching the planet.
The freedom of these corporations to pollute and the fixation on a feeble lifestyle reaction is no accident. It is the result of an ideological war, waged over the last forty years, against the possibility of collective action. Devastatingly successful, it is not too late to reverse it.
The political project of neoliberalism, brought to ascendence by Thatcher and Reagan, has pursued two principal objectives. The first has been to dismantle any barriers to the exercise of unaccountable private power. The second had been to erect them to the exercise of any democratic public will.
Its trademark policies of privatization, deregulation, taxation cuts and free trade deals: these have liberated corporations to amas enormous earnings and treat the atmosphere like a sewage dump, and hamstrung our ability, through the instrument of the state, to plan for our collective welfare.
Anything resembling a collective check on corporate power has become a target of the elite: lobbying and corporate donations, hollowing out republics, have obstructed green policies and maintained fossil fuel subsidies flowing; and the rights of associations like unions, the most effective means for employees to wield power together, have been undercut whenever possible.
At the very moment when climate change demands an unprecedented collective public response, neoliberal ideology stands in the way. Which is why, if we want to bring down emissions fast, we will need to overcome all of its free-market mantras: take railways and utilities and energy grids back into public control; govern corporations to phase out fossil fuels; and raise taxes to pay for massive investment in climate-ready infrastructure and renewable energy so that solar panel can go on everyones rooftop , not just on those who can afford it.
Neoliberalism has not merely ensured this agenda is politically unrealistic: it has also tried to make it culturally unthinkable. Its celebration of competitive self-interest and hyper-individualism, its stigmatization of compassion and solidarity, has frayed our collective bonds. It has spread, like an insidious anti-social toxin, what Margaret Thatcher preached: there is no such thing as society.
Studies show that people who have grown up under this era have indeed become more individualistic and consumerist. Steeped in a culture telling us to think of ourselves as consumers instead of citizens, as self-reliant instead of interdependent, is it any wonder we deal with a systemic issue by turning in droves to ineffectual, individual attempts? We are all Thatchers children.
Even before the advent of neoliberalism, the capitalist economy had thrived on people believing that being afflicted by the structural problems of an exploitative system poverty, joblessness, poor health, lack of fulfillment was in fact a personal deficiency.
Neoliberalism has taken this internalized self-blame and turbocharged it. It tells you that you should not merely feel guilts and shame if you cant secure a good job, are deep in debt, and are too emphasized or overworked for day with friends. You are now also responsible for bearing the burden of potential ecological collapse.
Of course we need people reducing consumption and innovating low-carbon alternatives building sustainable farms, inventing battery storages, spreading zero-waste methods. But individual options will most count when the economic system can provide viable, environmental options for everyonenot just an affluent or intrepid few.
If affordable mass transit isnt available, people will commute with vehicles. If local organic food is too expensive, they wont opt out of fossil fuel-intensive super-market chains. If inexpensive mass produced goods flow endlessly, they will buy and buy and buy. This is the con-job of neoliberalism: to persuade us to address climate change through our pocket-books, rather than through power and politics.
Eco-consumerism may be able to expiate your guilt. But its only mass movements that have the power to alter the trajectory of the climate crisis. This requires of us first a resolute mental transgres from the spell cast by neoliberalism: to stop thinking like individuals.
The good news is that the impulse of humans to come together is inextinguishable and the collective imagination is already making a political come-back. The climate justice movement is blocking pipelines, forcing the divestment of trillions of dollars, and winning support for 100% clean energy economies in cities and states across the world. New ties are being drawn to Black Lives Matter, immigrant and Indigenous rights, and fights for better wages. On the heels of such movements, political parties seem eventually ready to defy neoliberal dogma.
None more so than Jeremy Corbyn, whose Labour Manifesto spelled out a redistributive project to address climate change: by publicly retooling the economy, and insisting that corporate oligarchs no longer run amok. The notion that the rich should pay their fair share to fund this transformation was considered laughable by the political and media class. Millions disagreed. Society, long said to be departed, is now back with a vengeance.
So grow some carrots and jump on a bike: it will construct you happier and healthier. But it is time to stop obsessing with how personally green we live and start collectively taking on corporate power.
Twitter : em> @Martin_Lukacs